brandon.summary

1) The value of an historic covered bridge lies in the workmanship, methods and joinery of the original builders and the timber from Vermont's old forests used in the construction. This historic integrity needs to be preserved.
David Wright - Historic fabric is at the heart of preserving a covered bridge. A replica is not an original. Even if you repair a covered bridge in kind, the most sensitive restoration or rehabilitation, it is still not the original structure.
       The fabric that should be saved is that which is still functional and could continue to serve.
       The historic fabric is the focus of preservation. Otherwise, it is not preservation at all, it is pretty structures for tourists, it is replication.
       If you see a stick that looks good from the outside, but has rotted, it is the illusion of the historic fabric, so one shouldn't feel too badly on removing that stick.
       If you remove pieces of a covered bridge truss that don't need to be removed in order to get greater capacity from it, you're not preserving the bridge, you are not restoring it, you are doing damage to it.
       Even a very badly deteriorated bridge can be restored somehow. It may mean a lot of replacement material, a lot of splicing, and a lot of doubling up, but we're trying to save the historic fabric.
       The real monument is the trusses, upper and lower lateral bracing systems and probably the wind bracing. So anything which alters those makes the bridge less bear witness to it's period.

Phil Pierce - Our efforts for historic preservation should be more focused on maintaining the skills necessary to rebuild these important structures, than just on maintaining the material of the bridge.
       If we replace components as necessary, using traditional details and methods, to the extent possible, then we are maintaining that structure for our children and their children to enjoy for the indefinite future. Otherwise, they will eventually decay to the point that they will become useless heaps of rotting timber.
       I believe the builders of these bridges would much prefer a useful bridge that strongly resembles the one they built to an unsafe object.
       In naval Architecture, fabric be damned, keep the keel. It is imperative that you keep the integrity of the structure.

Jan Lewandoski - The design and the historic engineering of the bridge is as important as the actual structure.
       It's the historic trusses that are the most important thing we are trying to preserve. Rather than subdivide a bridge into spans just to keep the historic fabric intact, it is better to change more material to keep the bridge as a single span still functioning, rather than save historic fabric but reduce the function of the bridge.

2) To preserve historic integrity when a covered bridge is repaired, the joinery used by the original craftsman should be duplicated and the timber used in the repair should be of the same species as the original.

David Wright - To preserve the historical integrity when a covered bridge is repaired, the joinery used by the original craftsman, 'must' be duplicated and the timber used in the repair should be of the same species as the original.

John Weaver - If the desired methods and materials to preserve historic integrity are not practical, then supplemental support systems or splicing with modern materials should be considered to preserve otherwise functional historic members.

Jan Lewandoski - If you can, restore in kind; same species, same joinery, same member sizes, same everything. But there are often reasons why you can't, one of them being changing use of the bridge. If you are going to put much heavier loads on it, you may have to beef it up. Most of the bridges in the state had lighter floor systems at one time, for horses and wagons. Heavier trucks required heavier floor systems. The floor systems were changed throughout the 30s, 40s, and 50s.
       Some bridges were no good the day they were built. They are still here, but they have flaws in their design, so what do you do? Throw the bridge away? No. Stick piers all over the place in it? Well, maybe, but you can't easily do that. You can do a number of other things. From repair in kind; same species; joinery; size; to change of species of some members.

Phil Pierce - It is more important to maintain the skills of dealing with a bridge effectively by craftsmen that know what they are doing, rather than necessarily saying that thou shalt keep the fabric at all costs. (Develop craftsmen to keep the tradition of building wooden bridges alive.)

2a)Native timber should be used in covered bridge restoration, other timber to be used as last resort.

3) Covered bridges should remain in service with historic integrity intact. To achieve this the bridge needs to be maintained on a regular basis to keep deterioration from occurring to avoid large-scale repairs that could compromise historic integrity.
3a) The trusses must be kept dry: Approaches to the bridge must be properly drained, or sloped to keep run-off away from the bridge structure; Roof leaks need to be repaired immediately. Road dirt must not be allowed to accumulate on the truss members; the bridge must be kept clear of weeds, brush, and saplings.
3b) Oversized and overweight vehicles must be prevented from entering the bridge. A smooth transition between approach roadway and the bridge floor must be maintained to prevent shock to the bridge structure by entering vehicles.
3c) In addition to regular maintenance, the bridge should be inspected at least twice annually: Once prior to spring, and once prior to winter with remedial action taken in preparation for the season.

4) When a covered bridge has deteriorated to the point that it must be repaired or restored, the restoration contract needs to be explicit that if the bridge is found to be beyond restoring to full use to convey motor traffic, it must not be destroyed by replacing all or a significant portion of the original truss, but instead left intact, bypassed or removed from its site.
4a) The bridge, retired on site, can be repaired to safely support foot or cycle traffic while maintaining its historical integrity.
4b) If the retired covered bridge is removed from its site, it should repaired to prevent further deterioration, preserving its historical integrity, and maintained as a visitor's center or placed in a park or museum.
4c) It would be optional to replace the removed bridge with a replica or with a modern bridge.

5) To keep historic integrity: Native timber, meaning northeast species, should be used in covered bridge restoration, other timber to be used as last resort. To permit the use of native timber in bridge structures, there needs to be an effort by the timber industry to test, characterize, and certify north-eastern species.
5a)A non-destructive test protocol needs to be developed to be used on a covered bridge prior to writing the contract for repair or restoration to ascertain the true condition of its components, this to avoid discovering the structure to be in such a state as only complete replacement of a significant percentage of the truss is required to restore it to full use, resulting in the loss of historic integrity.

Phil Pierce - The national leaders in the establishment of timber allowable stresses are centered at the Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, Wisconsin. They would love to do even more than they already have (yet they have led the world in this field). However, additional research carries with it the need for additional funding. If the VCBS wishes to urge more research, you should recognize that no one will voluntarily conduct such work without funding.
       Regarding non-destructive testing protocols; timber is very difficult to deal with, unlike the more consistent nature of metal or even concrete. To my knowledge, no governmental agency has adopted any existing protocols as consistently effective in this regard. Again, if more development of this field is wanted it will take a lot more funding.

David Wright - Non-destructive test protocols must be developed.

6) To make maintenance of historic covered bridges effective: A practical way to enforce vehicle dimension restrictions needs to be developed. Partnerships between towns, the Vermont Historic Bridge Program should be encouraged. A practical way to enforce vehicle weight restrictions needs to be developed.

Phil Pierce - We can force dimensional limitations.

7) To pursue its policies the VCBS and its members will: Organize area chapters (Bridge Watch Areas) for the purpose of establishing a working relationship with the local municipal governments, historical societies and Chambers of Commerce to promote bridge maintenance and tourism, and to guard against vandalism; Educate the public on the value of Vermont's historic bridges; Work with the VAOT Historic Bridge Program.

8) On preservation discipline:

David Wright - One [of the questions] was the dating of the material. New material gets put in should be recorded. There are drawings of record. What's new and what's old should be clearly indicated on them. The pieces could be marked discretely in various places. When one of these bridges is to be restored or rehabilitated or beefed up, there should be drawings of record made of the bridge as it was found at the start of the project. Everything ought to be photographed, everything ought to be drawn. I know it's a cost, but never the less we are talking about principles of preservation here. These steps ought to be part of the preservation process before the bridge is touched.
      The carrying capacity for some bridges can be upgraded using traditional methods, at the same time taking care that the changes are reversible.

Phil Pierce - There should/must be a requirement to distinguish old fabric from new, both in the drawings and on the bridge itself.
       The bridges were not designed for the heavy kinds of vehicles we ask them to handle today. Push for less design weight vehicles.
       Is it not imperative to maintain a specific type of roofing material.

Ed Barna - It is important to preserve the original timbers as much as possible. I think maybe what the policy ought to do is say, if they can't be preserved in the bridge, they ought to be preserved, or reused in some way out of the bridge to leave something to the future.
       Save bridges by building higher capacity bridges near them, Preserving covered bridges as secondary rather than primary transportation structures.
       Grow plots of timber for the express purpose of creating and restoring wooden bridges.
       OK to put steel beams underneath bridges to allow the wood to remain intact (as fail safe).

Niel Daniels - We should [build for] passenger car use with these structures because that's closer to the weights the were built for initially, But many of the old ones without any work on them will carry 30,000. They won't calculate, but they'll carry it day after day. That's some of that "Access Carrying Capacity."

Jan Lewandoski - Only fix things that are broken on covered bridges.

9) Improve the process of covered bridge oversight:

John Weaver - I think the answer to covered bridge evaluation is better quantitative analysis. This may involve some evaluation of secondary support members and reserve capacity of the bridge as well for live loads. It certainly involves some investigation and evaluation for dead load which is long term and can be more severe in some cases than live loads in some structures. To enhance the quantitative analysis I think that when a project is started, if possible, a wood scientist should be employed to give an evaluation of just what the lumber is in the bridge so you know what your starting point is, so you don't just run to the NDS tables and look for the most conservative values to work with. If you know what values you really had to begin with, then you know where to start.

David Wright - General contractors are one of the problems we have with some covered bridge restoration projects. Covered bridge repair, covered bridge restoration, seasoning of timbers, selecting timbers, finding where to order a special timber is not routine for them. They may win the bidding process, and then issue change orders until projects get out of control and bridges end up being seriously adulterated.

Phil Pierce - Advocate design-build contracts rather than design-bid-build so that contractors and engineers can work together as a team. Each has viewpoints and expertise that work well together.
       Extant covered bridges were not designed to today's standards and we cannot expect them to meet today's requirements.

Neil Daniels - I want to urge that we work with representative Don Davis, possibly next year, that would be the second year of his two year term, in our preservation policy and the State preservation policy paper that had been circulated today.

Return to top

No part of this web site may be reproduced without the written permission of Joseph C. Nelson
This file posted March 25, 2002